Merloo
SMKW God of the Wars
Posts: 5,486
|
Post by Merloo on Sept 2, 2008 15:56:31 GMT -5
He's not arguing. He's trying to see a pattern where there isn't any. If you want to say those are accurate, then perhaps they should follow in sequential order, which they don't. He just picks certain numbers off the list, sometimes not even in any real order, and just throws them out there.
He's also trying to deter me from arguing, for no real reason. I haven't done anything wrong. Instead of arguing what I'm saying, people try and argue my character, which is flawed in and of itself, as it is not only a logical fallacy, it is also something that can't be accurately judged.
And if anyone is misinterpreting my arguments, they should read them more carefully. They aren't that complicated, aside from times when I flat out say they aren't easy to understand.
|
|
Cannibal Joe
Board Regular
These little guys are everywhere, and there's only one guy for the job.
Posts: 287
|
Post by Cannibal Joe on Sept 2, 2008 16:02:03 GMT -5
Fine, I'll be entirely logical on this one, YOU ARE MAKING IT UNFAIR, WE CAN'T ATTACK YOU, are you getting this? WHILE YOU HAVE THOSE STARS SO POWERFUL, TONE IT DOWN A LITTLE BIT!
All caps so that I'm not misunderstood
|
|
Merloo
SMKW God of the Wars
Posts: 5,486
|
Post by Merloo on Sept 2, 2008 16:03:46 GMT -5
1. I don't consider all caps being extremely logical. It's the internet equivalent of shouting, for one. 2. What in particular is unfair 3. You can to attack me. 4. I understand that you are incensed for some reason. 5. Do you even know what the Stars do? 6. I shouldn't have to tone anything down when we have things like Lash's descriptions abounding, even though descriptions are just rough ideas, and never an accurate representation of power.
|
|
|
Post by soulofhachi on Sept 2, 2008 16:06:57 GMT -5
And what exactly in my description is godmodding, Merloo? While some description are exaggerated, Lash always follows it up with how it's "Invincibility" or world destroying ability isn't working because of some mechanical problem.
|
|
Cannibal Joe
Board Regular
These little guys are everywhere, and there's only one guy for the job.
Posts: 287
|
Post by Cannibal Joe on Sept 2, 2008 16:10:47 GMT -5
1. I don't consider all caps being extremely logical. It's the internet equivalent of shouting, for one. 2. What in particular is unfair 3. You can to attack me. 4. I understand that you are incensed for some reason. 5. Do you even know what the Stars do? 6. I shouldn't have to tone anything down when we have things like Lash's descriptions abounding, even though descriptions are just rough ideas, and never an accurate representation of power. Flaw in logic # 1 just because I shouted, doesn't mean I was wrong Flaw in logic #2 You assume that because I am making assumptions, you assume that I don't have a logical opinion on the subject, and thus am wrong Flaw in logic #3 you assume my anger makes me wrong, when in fact that my anger came after my opinion was stated Flaw in logic #4 You are comparing two entirely different things, a mech and a group of bandits do not have the same rules apply to them
|
|
|
Post by meowzer on Sept 2, 2008 16:16:58 GMT -5
Merloo, you should at least make them so they are able to be stolen.
|
|
|
Post by bulbmin on Sept 2, 2008 16:23:17 GMT -5
HEY GUYS NOW YOU KNOW WHY I DON'T PLAY SMKW ANY MORE
|
|
Merloo
SMKW God of the Wars
Posts: 5,486
|
Post by Merloo on Sept 2, 2008 17:34:55 GMT -5
The big problem with just about everyone here is that they don't realize the fundamental reason why I say what I do. Aside from the fact that being an arrogant villain is in general more fun than being a modest hero, and arrogant heroes are not even half as fun, there is an added reason.
Psychological reasons, to be precise. My words may seem like simple boasting, but they also seem to have an added effect of inspiring fear. I honestly don't want to fight anyone, and time and time again I have said that in a direct fight, I think most people here could win. Yet, by saying what I do, by my actions, I create fear, which is what causes these arguments. Fear causes one of two reactions, most of the time. Either it causes people to avoid, or destroy. I want the first, but the latter more often comes up. If I make people avoid wanting to fight me, then I have no need to worry anymore.
And Cackletta I bring up again, for Artifact possession effects.
|
|
|
Post by meowzer on Sept 2, 2008 18:47:29 GMT -5
Fear? Hardly.
|
|
Merloo
SMKW God of the Wars
Posts: 5,486
|
Post by Merloo on Sept 2, 2008 18:49:05 GMT -5
Then don't respond with stereotypical text book examples of what I've seen, and maybe I won't classify it as such.
|
|
|
Post by vidguysteve on Sept 2, 2008 19:10:25 GMT -5
The way I see it is that if two Administrators and even two people who are completely new here say that it's unfair, then it's unfair.
|
|
Merloo
SMKW God of the Wars
Posts: 5,486
|
Post by Merloo on Sept 2, 2008 19:11:34 GMT -5
Why was it fair when you did it then? Why was it fair when RLDline did it? Why is it that whenever I try and do something that anyone else higher up in this game does, they are allowed to, but I can't. It's completely and utterly ridiculous.
|
|
|
Post by vidguysteve on Sept 2, 2008 19:13:30 GMT -5
Because we present our things in way so that they can be overcome without an entire Army focusing on the object.
|
|
Merloo
SMKW God of the Wars
Posts: 5,486
|
Post by Merloo on Sept 2, 2008 19:17:24 GMT -5
Really? I never once said that you had to focus on that. Let's see, going off of this:
1. No electronic or technical devices are allowed anti-EMP projects
2. No anti-magic protection projects
3. No electronic or technical devices are allowed anti-hacking projects
4. No immunities to natural elemental weakness'
5. All the above is also included under the clause of protection, for that is but a lesser form of immunity.
And I'm sure I can think of more. If you ban this, then you must ban all of the above, for they fall into the same exact category, if not worse, as mine isn't flat-out ignoring the negation, it's merely reverting to a lower form. They are one and the same, and people only see it as a problem when I choose to employ the same methods used against me. Fighting fire with fire is fine, so long as I am excluded from such endeavors.
As well, I still see no reason why people aren't allowing themselves to be let out of the trap I created with mere words alone. It's silly that people are so easily beguiled by such actions.
|
|
Cannibal Joe
Board Regular
These little guys are everywhere, and there's only one guy for the job.
Posts: 287
|
Post by Cannibal Joe on Sept 2, 2008 19:21:02 GMT -5
The difference is that Fawful's stuff had limits to what it could repel
Also you're pretty much saying that you can exploit any loophole you see fit.
|
|